Development Workflow
Document Control​
- Last Updated: February 4, 2025
- Version: 2.0.0
- Status: Active
- Owner: Development Team Lead
- Next Review: May 4, 2025
Purpose​
To establish a standardized development workflow that ensures code quality, maintainability, and efficient collaboration across all development teams.
Scope​
This workflow covers all development activities:
- Code Development
- Version Control
- Code Review
- Testing
- Deployment
- Documentation
Development Process​
1. Feature Planning​
- Review requirements documentation
- Break down tasks into manageable units
- Create detailed technical specifications
- Set up feature branch from main/develop
- Update project board with new tasks
2. Development Phase​
- Follow coding standards and guidelines
- Write unit tests for new features
- Document code as you write
- Make regular commits with clear messages
- Keep feature branch updated with main
3. Code Review Process​
- Create pull request with detailed description
- Address reviewer comments promptly
- Update documentation if needed
- Ensure all tests pass
- Get required approvals
4. Testing​
- Run automated test suite
- Perform manual testing
- Document test results
- Fix any identified issues
- Update test documentation
5. Deployment​
- Merge to staging branch
- Deploy to staging environment
- Perform smoke tests
- Get stakeholder approval
- Deploy to production
6. Post-Deployment​
- Monitor for issues
- Document any hotfixes
- Update documentation
- Close related tickets
- Update project board
Best Practices​
Git Workflow​
At GravityVC, we follow trunk-based development with the following standards:
1. Branch Structure​
main- Production codefeature/*- Feature branches (short-lived)hotfix/*- Emergency fixes
2. Branch Naming​
feature/[ticket-number]-brief-description
hotfix/[ticket-number]-brief-description
Examples:
feature/GVC-123-add-user-authentication
hotfix/GVC-456-fix-payment-processing
3. Development Flow​
- Create feature branch from
main - Develop and test locally
- Push changes frequently (at least daily)
- Create PR when feature is complete
- Merge to
mainafter approval - Delete feature branch
4. Commit Standards​
- Atomic commits (one logical change per commit)
- Clear commit messages following conventional commits:
feat: add user authentication
fix: resolve payment processing error
docs: update API documentation
test: add unit tests for auth module
refactor: improve error handling
5. Pull Request Process​
- Create PR with detailed description
- Add relevant reviewers
- Pass automated checks
- Address review comments
- Get required approvals
- Squash and merge to main
6. Code Review Standards​
- Review within 24 hours
- Focus on:
- Logic correctness
- Security concerns
- Performance implications
- Test coverage
- Code style
Code Quality​
- Follow style guide
- Write self-documenting code
- Include comments for complex logic
- Maintain test coverage
- Regular code cleanup
Documentation​
- Update API documentation
- Maintain README files
- Document configuration changes
- Keep deployment guides current
- Update troubleshooting guides
Tools and Resources​
- Version Control: Git
- Code Review: GitHub
- CI/CD: GitHub Actions
- Testing: Jest, Cypress
- Documentation: Markdown
Related Documents​
- Code Review Guidelines
- Testing Standards
- Deployment Checklist
- API Documentation Template
- Technical Specification Template